The Differentiation of the Transcendental

Forrest: We keep detecting something, even though we have no proof of it. Why do you say in this instance that it does positively confirm something? I'm saying it's undetectable. The question was what again? Why? You don't think there's little elves running around fixing your sandwiches and keeping your refrigerator going,. That fits the criteria about this transcendent stuff. So what is the differentiation there for you?