Honey: I was surprised to hear the arguments in Twitter, Tamna. There were real legitimate questions about the breadth of 230 is the way the law courts have interpreted. Honey: The justices may open the door in their ruling for a future case that would welcome maybe a case better on the facts.
As Justice Kagan has asked, “Every other industry has to internalize the costs of its conduct. Why is it that the tech industry gets a pass?” Yet she and the other 8 Supreme Court Justices seemed wary this week as they heard oral arguments in two cases that could upend the Section 230 immunity that social media companies enjoy, Gonzalez v. Google and Twitter v. Taamneh. Today, we hear from three experts: Stanford Law professor Evelyn Douek, National Constitution Center President and CEO Jeffrey Rosen and UC Berkeley computer science professor Hany Farid. Up for discussion — what’s at stake in these two cases, which way the wind seems to be blowing and, of course, will killing Section 230 kill the internet?
Questions? Comments? Email us on@voxmedia.com or find us on Twitter @karaswisher and @nayeema
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices