The Qataris have come up with their own carbon credit scheme, which has been internationally approved. But you look at the projects that are being supported by these credits, and you have like a wind farm in Kosovo or a hydroelectric dam. Do you think football generally needs to work a bit harder on actually reducing its environmental impact? I do think this has a power and a use and it's worthwhile and should be supported.
It’s supposed to be the first ever carbon neutral World Cup. Organisers Fifa and host Qatar say they have implemented sustainability initiatives, taken measures to limit carbon output and will offset greenhouse gas emissions by purchasing credits. Fifa has admitted, however, that the tournament’s carbon footprint will bigger than any of its predecessors, and experts believe emissions have been underestimated, calling into question the claim of carbon neutrality. Madeleine Finlay speaks to sports reporter Paul MacInnes about the environmental burden of building stadiums, flying in players and fans from around the world and keeping the pitches green, and asks whether football is really ready to face up to its carbon footprint. Help support our independent journalism at
theguardian.com/sciencepod