Is There a Difference Between Climate Change and Artificial Intelligence?

2min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

I liked, don't look up. I it has a silliness about it which makes it great theatre, but not necessarily a great depiction of reality. And the uncertainties in climate modelling real and have been exploited by those who want to continue to make money under the current system. So, like likewise artificial intelligence, we've seen attempts by those whoere working in the current system to say, well, if you're in favour of dealing, of reducing artificial intelligence risks, you must be against artificial intelligence. That's just silly position,. But you certainly see it cropping up from time to time.

We’re pretty well-calibrated when it comes to dealing with common, everyday-level setbacks. But our brains aren’t naturally equipped for dealing with unlikely but world-catastrophic disasters. Yet such threats are real, both natural and human-induced. We need to collectively get better at anticipating and preparing for them, at the level of political action. Andrew Leigh is an academic and author who now serves in the Parliament of Australia. We discuss how to move the conversation about existential risks from the ivory tower to implementation in real policies.

Support Mindscape on Patreon.

Andrew Leigh received his Ph.D. in Public Policy from the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University. He is a member of the Australian House of Representatives representing Fenner. He was previously a professor of economics at Australian National University, and has served as Shadow Assistant Minister for Treasury and Charities. His recent book is What’s the Worst That Could Happen? Existential Risk and Extreme Politics.

See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.