Biblical Inerrancy Among Christian Scholars

26min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

The hosts discuss the issue of biblical inerrancy among Christian scholars, exploring different views on the historical accuracy of the Bible. They also touch on the New Testament writers quoting scripture out of context and examine the use of familiar terminology in liberal scholarship. The chapter emphasizes the importance of recognizing the God of truth and engaging in honest scholarship while acknowledging uncertainties.

The Bible. A divinely-inspired book so glorious and yet so debated these days that we decided to record another podcast on this essential topic.

In 1820 Thomas Jefferson completed his redacted version of the Four Gospels he called “The Philosophy and Morals of Jesus.” Although it wasn’t published in his lifetime, “The Jefferson Bible” would become a popular example of an alarming trend in post-enlightenment hermeneutics: cutting and pasting with the Word of God.

According to Jefferson and other readers and scholars since, the Bible is an imperfect text. There might be truth in its pages, but it needs a modern lens, or additions, or subtractions to purify it or to make sense of its ancient obscure meaning. There are hard things to understand in the Bible, they say, supernatural events that are difficult to believe. So, does the Bible need to change? Or do we?

Visit christianityandliberalism.com for more on the book, audiobook, and show.

Music: “Line in the Sand (C&L)” by Timothy Brindle Produced by Nobody Special Wrath and Grace Records Music Licensing Codes: E1SE4GBTPOVFBRDI YSO2WXNPTOPNUQYH