The Bondi vs. Vanderstock Case: Ghost Guns and Legal Challenges

This chapter explores the Bondi versus Vanderstock court case, focusing on the interpretation of federal regulations surrounding ghost guns and firearm definitions under the Gun Control Act of 1968. The discussion highlights the complexities of statutory interpretation and the implications of recent Supreme Court rulings on administrative rules regarding gun kits. Additionally, it examines the procedural history of the case, the validity of facial challenges, and the potential shifts in agency deference amidst evolving judicial precedents.