The Concept of Being a Property Is Exposed in Reality, Right?

There's a difference between the internal coherence of a thing and whether or not that thing exists in reality. In this case, theing a property is exemplified by itself. So i almost ont you just kind of like sidestep this concern that might be behind the analytic distinction that we see from richard swinburne syche. No, we're not assuming that god exists at this point. We're just talking about the concept of a necessary being. And it doesn't really seem like there's anything internally problematic with that,. Unless you've got some argument that it's that there is some kind of internal incoherence in that concept.