Supreme Court Ruling on Presidential Immunity

This chapter explores the implications of a recent Supreme Court ruling that may provide presidents with immunity from prosecution for official acts, potentially affecting future cases involving state election interference. Experts analyze the high bar for proving intrusion on executive branch authority, critique the opinion's complexity, and debate the impact on prosecutorial discretion in cases like the Mar-a-Lago situation. The discussion also touches on Trump's legal challenges and concerns about the lack of guardrails for the presidency in light of the ruling.