This chapter explores the management of ventricular tachycardia (VT) through a clinical vignette of a 70-year-old male with a complex cardiac history. It discusses the evolution of antiarrhythmic therapies, focusing on recent findings from the VANISH-2 trial regarding catheter ablation versus drug therapy. Emphasizing the implications of treatment choice on mortality and patient outcomes, the chapter highlights the critical need for tailored interventions in clinical practice.
Transcript
chevron_right
Play full episode
chevron_right
Transcript
Episode notes
Join CardioNerds EP Council Chair Dr. Naima Maqsood and Episode Lead Dr. Jeanne De Lavallaz as they discuss the results of the VANISH2 Trial with expert faculty Dr. Jeff Healey and Dr. Roderick Tung. Audio editing by CardioNerds academy intern, Grace Qiu.
The VANISH2 trial enrolled 416 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, an ICD in place, and recurrent episodes of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) to receive either first-line VT catheter ablation or antiarrhythmic drug therapy with the primary composite outcome of death from any cause, appropriate ICD shock, ventricular tachycardia storm (meaning at least 3 ventricular tachycardia events within 24hrs) or treated ventricular tachycardia below the detection limit of the ICD. The study population had a mean age of 68 years, with 94% being men and predominantly of white ethnicity. On average, 14 years had elapsed since their last myocardial infarction, with approximately 60% having undergone percutaneous coronary intervention at the time. The mean ejection fraction was 34%.
Sapp, J. L., Tang, A. S. L., Parkash, R., Stevenson, W. G., Healey, J. S., Gula, L. J., Nair, G. M., & the VANISH2 Study Team. (2025). Catheter ablation or antiarrhythmic drugs for ventricular tachycardia. The New England Journal of Medicine, 392, 737–747.
The AI-powered Podcast Player
Save insights by tapping your headphones, chat with episodes, discover the best highlights - and more!
