Evolving Interpretations of Cruel and Unusual Punishment

This chapter examines the case of Paul Weems and the severe consequences of the Kadena law in the Philippines, contrasting it with American legal standards. It delves into the historical evolution of the Eighth Amendment's interpretation, showcasing how courts adapt to societal changes in understanding justice. The discussion emphasizes key cases, including Trope versus Dulles, to illustrate the fluidity of constitutional principles regarding human rights and citizenship.