i think that looking at a vermir painting is more satisfying experience than looking at a rembrandt. Rembrandd, i agree, had an extraordinary capacity to make him yunow to find himself in the psychology of the sitters. But when you look at that extraordinary, electrifying painting, it's really rembrandt dissolving his personality inside the ethos of the group. And there's a kind of method, isn't there, in the way that both our speakers are approaching their subject matter.
We compare the works of two of the greatest painters of the Dutch Golden Age: Rembrandt and Vermeer. Making the case for Rembrandt van Rijn in this debate was historian, author and broadcaster Simon Schama. For Schama, Rembrandt's works are raw humanity personified with formal beauty being the least of the painter's concerns. Novelist Tracy Chevalier, however, champions Johannes Vermeer. She claims that the artist's charm lies in the very fact that he absents himself from his paintings and as a result they are less didactic and more magical.
The debate was chaired by art historian, writer and museum director, Tim Marlow.
For a list of works referenced in this debate, along with links to each, please go to:
https://intelligencesquared.com/events/rembrandt-vs-vermeer-titans-of-dutch-painting-simon-schama-tracy-chevalier/
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices