The Judaism of the New Testament and the Trial of Jesus

In the trial of jesus, there was this whole tendency to use rubinic texts. And it's beating them with her own book, in some ways. So they'll use the rabbinic rules of jurisprudence. Is laid out mostly in the missionaic tractate that aren't in place at that ti ta. That's the real problem, is he evidentialry divide - we can't tell if a text like mishna reflects an earlier time or not. Don't even keep their own law as part of your argument against judaism. I mean, let alone bring in another text that's totally different and then you've got all these arguments for both sides.