Cato Podcast cover image

The Supreme Court's Term on Criminal Justice

Cato Podcast

00:00

Is the Supreme Court Getting It Wrong in Bivins?

In vega versus taco, the court tried to define a cause of action under section 18 83. The question was whether an officer's actions caused a constitutional violation. Justice Kagan wrote that miranda rules are just prophylactic rules; they're not constitutional rules in and of themselves. But neither the majority nor the dissent really focused on that part of the argument," he said.

Transcript
Play full episode

The AI-powered Podcast Player

Save insights by tapping your headphones, chat with episodes, discover the best highlights - and more!
App store bannerPlay store banner
Get the app