AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
The Concept of Moral Obligation
I wasn't drawing an analogy, you know, a situation where you have coordination and God. What I was using that example to show is that the fact someone has reasons to support, say, a rule or has reasons to command an action doesn't follow from that. It seems to me that the existence of a rule can generate new reasons that didn't exist prior to the rule. And so sometimes the reason we prohibit them, sometimes the reasons you might prohibit something, there's not because the action has a feature that's problematic. Is that the action when it's done in some kind of coordinated way isproblematic.