Wenwe Go Back to Class?

5min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

There are two main criticisms of identity patan. One is that if we at least exclusively focus on things like a race and gender, we're going to lose class out of you. The other may be that we misunderstand the nature of some of the suffering of people who are disfavored a cross groups. And i think there was a split, even at the time, where some people say, well, actually, this opposition, or work class identity, is an incredibly good and valuable thing. We'll allow things like class to mettle us overtime, not because we're ignoring the injustices of class but because we've actually managed to rummage them.

Kwame Anthony Appiah is a British-Ghanaian philosopher, the Ethicist columnist for the New York Times Magazine, and one of today's deepest thinkers about the nature of identity. His scholarly writing, journalism, and novels help us to envision a world in which our professed categories enrich rather than impoverish—or, in his terms, a world which reveres “universality plus difference.”

In this week’s conversation, Kwame Anthony Appiah and Yascha Mounk discuss neutrality as a liberal ideal, the limits of identity politics, and the merits of race-abolitionism.

This transcript has been condensed and lightly edited for clarity.

Please do listen and spread the word about The Good Fight.

If you have not yet signed up for our podcast, please do so now by following this link on your phone.

Email: podcast@persuasion.community

Website: http://www.persuasion.community

Podcast production by John T. Williams, and Brendan Ruberry

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Connect with us!

Spotify | Apple | Google

Twitter: @Yascha_Mounk & @joinpersuasion

Youtube: Yascha Mounk

LinkedIn: Persuasion Community