I Think the Only Thing I'd Summarize With Is the Ability to See Both Sides of the Spectrum and That We Do Need Both

Long termism versus effective altruism. If you go too far in one direction like it's going to shape and shift your mindset. I think here's where competing philosophical schools can be really useful so in a situation like this Sam Bigman freed could have drawn upon Rawls veil of ignorance which basically says that when making a decision you should put yourself in shoes of the person that is stands to be harmed the most.