AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
3min chapter
Ewing v. California
5-4
The Importance of Proper Punishment
The Supreme Court's solicitor general says the idea that punishment must fit the crime is not part of our Constitution. The opinion stems back to a dissent he wrote in a case called Harmal envy Michigan, which we will eventually cover one day. His main argument was basically like, well, if they wanted it to include proportionality, they could have used the term or like something similar,. So we should assume that they were purposefully excluding it.
00:00
Transcript
Episode notes
Get the Snipd
podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any
moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share
& Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode