In a legal case, maybe the correlation would be enough. Not in my mind. In my mind, he's just being a lawyer, basically. He's a lawyer who had chased after these exact kinds of things. I believe he says, why would you be okay with this? If it's doing this to the frogs, you're going to take a big swig of that. This is something worrisome that should be looked into.
Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com
Content:
-----------
- Musk to fight Zuckerberg in Octagon?
- When scientists won't debate
- Disney loses its chief diversity officer
- Durham & Schiff
- One parent homes (bad science)
- Lots more absurdities
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.
---
Support this podcast:
https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/scott-adams00/support