Therinos vs Elizabeth Holmes

I think they don't want to lose credibility now with the jurors. So they've laid out the argument, they've elicited the testimony. The two don't match up. It's a pretty far fetched argument to make that she should be absolved of any criminal liability at all based on this abusive relationship. And i think that just purely by dint of having it sort of existing on the record in the background, they've gotten the benefit of whatever that testimony is going to do and now they're moving forward with the legal arguments.