The Debate on Scalia and the Second Amendment

I'm not going to say Stevens is right because who is the better read on history here is. Besides the point, right? Like this whole debate is ridiculous. Neither of them are historians. Scalia had like an undergraduate degree in history, which like, I don't know, I had an undergrad degree in psychology and philosophy. They're arrogant amateurs who are just picking and choosing from their favorite Amicus brief about what fits their, you know, partisan goals. It's stupid beyond the point of even being worth like.