i think partly it's that a lot of political will went back into the city and to desume further out. scholars like to think of cities as having a metabolism, and they're feeding ther feeding off of something. And am and the political process, for a while, was starving cities of a funding of capital, of redevelopment opportunities. When that shifted, inner cities were able to rethink themselves,. New buildings attract, tract younger families. Younger families were then moving into older buildings and renovating them themselves.
The concept of the city is a crucial one for human civilization: people living in proximity, bringing in resources from outside, separated from the labors of subsistence so they can engage in the trade of goods and ideas. But we are still learning how cities grow and adapt to new conditions, as well as how we can best guide them to be livable as well as functional. I talk with urban scientist Catherine Brinkley about the structure of cities, including the fractal nature of their shapes, as well as what we can do to make cities thrive as much as possible.
Support Mindscape on Patreon.
Catherine Brinkley received a Ph.D. in City and Regional Planning as well as a degree in Veterinary Medicine from the University of Pennsylvania. She is currently Associate Professor of Human Ecology and Faculty Director at the Center for Regional Change at the University of California, Davis. She has been awarded fellowships from the Fulbright Foundation, the National Center for Faculty Development and Diversity, and the Santa Fe Institute.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.