Is There a Level of Analysis in Psychology?

2min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

David Petrsowski: This paper tries to demonstrate that theyve this whole time, this debate has been just a confusion about levels of analysis. The intentional level contains the first person phenomenology of how things feel and includes mental states such as emotions, beliefs, s, desires and so on. So you can have a whole sort of theory of causality that appeals to intentions and desires. And it makes sense to say, you know, why did i drop this? Because i wanted to. It's not wrong to say that. But by the way, did you find this paper to be a little bit, little bit exaggerated? Yes. They were like saying, this is perhaps been the

David and Tamler talk about the often rancorous debate among cognitive scientists and evolutionary psychologists over whether the mind is modular -- composed of discrete systems responsible for vision, reasoning, cheater detection, sexual jealousy, and so on. David and Tamler (mostly David) describe the history of the debate, then dive into a recent paper (Pietraszewski & Wertz, 2021) arguing that virtually all the disagreement is the product of a conceptual and methodological confusion â€“ that the two sides are operating with different levels of analysis and talking past each other as a result.

Plus, we REALLY tried not to talk about the University of Austin thing for the whole opening segment. We had another topic lined up and everything. It just didnâ€™t work out. Cicero would understand. Bari Weiss stans might wanna skip to the main segment.