evolutionary psychology, i don't kno, t's like something like 70 % women. Why bet are getting degrees in that field? Anda, same thing in medicine and so on. I had a discussion with this with the name naomi oreskes, the loser historian of science,. In her book, o trust science, an that it's not just that men have been misogenistic historically. It's that even the questions that are asked, or the models that are used is more male oriented if you only have men working in the field. So introducing an bringing women into a field isn't that it feminizes the men ecessarily, or makes them less masaginistic
In a few decades, a torrent of new evidence and ideas about human evolution has allowed scientists to piece together a more detailed understanding of what went on thousands and even millions of years ago. Lesley Newson and Peter Richerson, a husband-and-wife team based at the University of California, Davis, have spent years together and individually researching and collaborating with scholars from a wide range of disciplines to produce a deep history of humankind. In A Story of Us, they present this rich narrative and explain how the evolution of our genes relates to the evolution of our cultures.