Are the Democrats More Likely to Be Victims?

3min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

A psychologist says that the potential for aggression and victimhood movements is much larger than an congenital population. So would you say by this measure that the Democrats are more likely to be violent or the Republicans? If this hypothesis holds that the the victimhood people are the more dangerous who is more dangerous? Now just check your first answer the the reflex answer. Your first your first answer is the other side right? Whoever's the other side. It's all the wokeness right? The wokeness is basically about victimhood right?

My new book LOSERTHINK, available now on Amazon https://tinyurl.com/rqmjc2a

Find my "extra" content on Locals: https://ScottAdams.Locals.com

Content:

Twitter rumors and employee demands
Geraldo Rivera on democrat party failing
The many things reaching peak absurdity
John Fetterman's debate performance and health
The pace of AI advancement
The BQ COVID variant

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If you would like to enjoy this same content plus bonus content from Scott Adams, including micro-lessons on lots of useful topics to build your talent stack, please see scottadams.locals.com for full access to that secret treasure.

--- Support this podcast: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/scott-adams00/support