The Jim Rutt Show cover image

EP146 John Vervaeke Part 4: Awakening from the Meaning Crisis

The Jim Rutt Show

00:00

Is There a Theoretical Mystery in the Eye?

i don't think that relevanc realization is in any way a theoretical mystery. I can't get outside of relevant realization and look at itat its functionality. This goes towards dikman's distinction between the observed self and the observing self. And james anddikemen argue that the eye is, in that sense, a phenomnological mystery. You can't have it as an object of thought. You can only be it. To use some of the language, e o a reflectaboter, i can only be aware. It's to confuse aa phenomena logical point.

Play episode from 01:12:25
Transcript

The AI-powered Podcast Player

Save insights by tapping your headphones, chat with episodes, discover the best highlights - and more!
App store bannerPlay store banner
Get the app