Eastern empires remained much more pluralistic than european polities that increasingly persecute religious difference in heresy just brutally. And i think that's one of the reasons why asia runs into trouble in the nineteenth century, because it's so much more pluralist in this period. They were not good, not a model proto proto liberals. But by contrast, Europeans tend to be more hostile, more consciously hostile, to ideas from or like books or teachings that seem to come from outside of, outside of europe.
Ayşe Zarakol on her book Before the West: The Rise and Fall of Eastern World Orders. How centuries of Asian empires from Genghis Khan to Timur and the early Ming Dynasty through the Ottomans and Mughals built dominant world orders and, ultimately, shaped the rise of Europe—and how that all might shape how we think about the crisis in the world order today.
Support The Dig at Patreon.com/TheDig
Check out phenomenalworld.org