In abstract philosophy land, of course, you could be wrong, right? You could be sure that this person is going to cause tremendous harm to the world, but maybe you're wrong. So I don't think that the in principle conclusion carries much weight in real world deliberations here. It seems inconceivable to me what Euclidean geometry was considered to be the answer without serious question for so long. The sphere, for example, would have been a well-known object Euclid himself.

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode