AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
The Devil's Advocate and a Defense of Clarence Thomas
Meadows: Thomas is not applying his own radical ideology fairly across all cases. He reduces those three cases to simply a substantive due process analysis right. And the one the substantive due process decision that he leaves out is loving v Virginia which allows for interracial marriages. Mark Meadows wishes he could forget about it because loving v Virginia is the interracial marriage education he happens to be interracially married.