Dave Foster Wallace says something that I think is insightful he said the passivity and schizoid decay still endure for later in his character's reception of images and waves of data. The ability to combine them only adds a layer of disorientation when all experience can be deconstructed and reconfigured they're become simply too many choices. In the absence of any credible non-commercial guides for living the freedom to choose is about as liberating quote unquote as a bad acid trip each quantum is as good as the next.
We dive into David Foster Wallace’s sprawling 1993 essay “E Unibus Pluram: Television and U.S. Fiction.” How do TV and new forms of media keep their hold on us when we know at some level that they’re reinforcing our loneliness and passivity? That’s easy, Wallace says, post-modern cool. Flatter me, let me think we’re all in the joke together, give me “an ironic permission-slip to do what I do best whenever I feel confused and guilty: assume, inside, a sort of fetal position, a pose of passive reception to comfort, escape, reassurance.” But in the years since this essay, the TV landscape has completely transformed. Has it transcended its function as a surrogate companion for lonely people, or has it just found new ways to keep us isolated and passive?
Plus, we talk about the recent new SPSP guidelines and Jon Haidt’s recent essay on why he’s resigning from the organization. (Sorry, Jon!)
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: