AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
3min chapter
A Wrecking Ball to Environmental Law
Strict Scrutiny
The Supreme Court's Judgment on the SACAT's Property
Both Justice Kagan and Justice Kavanaugh write opinions that are styled as concurrences in the judgment. That means they agree that the specific wetlanded issue in the case is not covered. But neither explains why the wetland on the SACAT's property is not covered by the Clean Water Act.
00:00
Transcript
Episode notes
Get the Snipd
podcast app
Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
AI-powered
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode
Save any
moment
Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways
Share
& Export
Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more
AI-powered
podcast player
Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features
Discover
highlights
Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode