The Argument for Diagnostic Substitution for Intellectual Disability

The whole person who influenced Springer and Jad's decision is named. We don't know who they are. The cowards. Put your name on it. Right. Mark was involved in a very similar situation in 2002 with this very same journal where somebody had published a paper that falsely said that autism was increasing because of diagnostic substitution for intellectual disability. It all played out in public space where everyone could review the data. And, you know, I can't tell you almost everyone that sits in these seats that I bring in here that have done brilliant work.