Do We Have to Get Rid of Section 230 or Just?

This case kind of puts in the Supreme Court's crosshairs the arguments that Clarence Thomas wanted to raise, which were awfully similar to the Thomas Smith arguments. These are arguments that have the potential to kind of cross cut across the parties and lead to perhaps a regime in which the answer to everything isn't "Internet section 230 applies right now" The question is, is the Supreme Court going to cut back at that? And my guess is that they probably will.