Chat GPT

I think the era of chat GPT in academia will not be as fruitful as the era of deep learning. Cause there's only one outcome, which is like a paragraph and then how do you determine if it's good or not? You have to have people read it. I agree to some degree, but I feel like that's where you could crush it as a researcher. If you just say. I gave a chat GPT generated analysis abstract paper to 50 scientists to peer review. And it passed for like 45.