I agree with the conclusion. I i would take exception with e beating reductionism. We're never going to solve it. It's not like one more narro science experiment or theory is going to have the answer. Constitutive panpsychism, i think, is physically incoherent because it makes this naive assumption that sub atomic particles are actually little bodies delineated in space. But that's just a metaphor. And if you really understand what sub atomic particles are, then then constitutive panpsychism becomes incoherent. It doesn't work. Thatw that turn in the history of science in that direction has led us to this hard problem of consciousness that really is kind of misconfig

Get the Snipd
podcast app

Unlock the knowledge in podcasts with the podcast player of the future.
App store bannerPlay store banner

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode

Save any
moment

Hear something you like? Tap your headphones to save it with AI-generated key takeaways

Share
& Export

Send highlights to Twitter, WhatsApp or export them to Notion, Readwise & more

AI-powered
podcast player

Listen to all your favourite podcasts with AI-powered features

Discover
highlights

Listen to the best highlights from the podcasts you love and dive into the full episode