Futility Closet cover image

349-The National Hotel Disease

Futility Closet

00:00

The Sports Anecdote Podcast

The court ruled that both the plaintiff and defendant had an equal and undivided interest in the ball. A baseball which is dislodged by incidental contact with an inanimate object or another person before momentum had ceased is not possessed. The case judge ended up choosing a definition of possession written by a law professor at the university of california. And i guess, if they couldn't determine who owned the ball, then it makes sense that they would decide that the ball should be sold and the proceeds split. But that perhaps misses the point that the two parties might just have really wanted to own this particular ball for financial reasons. Do you remember when Barry bons hit his 70 third home

Play episode from 20:31
Transcript

The AI-powered Podcast Player

Save insights by tapping your headphones, chat with episodes, discover the best highlights - and more!
App store bannerPlay store banner
Get the app