Even harm based justifications bottom out in terms of reasons at some point, right? I mean, if the only point you're making is- Well, not in my opinion. But that doesn't mean you can't- Bible says no. Yeah. There's a difference. Like, the stopping point has to be a place in which I think is a fruitful point. We don't care about whether somebody puts his penis instead of a goat or something. That's like saying it's rape is okay because there are candidates. It's not defending cannibalism. He's simply pointing out the fact that we don't even get disturbed by these other types of questions in the way that we get