The Fun Criterion in Chess

I think the his explicit ideas are he's trying to be a chess commentator. So he is trying to say what in this position is most likely to lead to a win or something like that. And then, so, so whenever you make a chess move, there's some explicit theory behind it as well as an in explicit one. But then when you're commentating, you haven't got access to all of that. Chess is a game where you can't play unless you integrate them to some extent. Unless you're unless you're a chess engine. They only have explicit theories and they're incapable of having fun. Many of their games are notoriously not fun. Occasionally, they hit on