Is Reparation a Regressive for Black Majority Countries?

2min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

Speaker against motion is tony sewell, an educational consultant and ceo of the charity generating genius. He argues that reparation is actually a regressive for black majority countries and black individuals. And because it mainly gives too much power and agency to white people. The key figure here is marcus garvin, the father,. if you're like, the father figure of pan africanism not really interested in reparations really.

Should there be a broad programme of reparations – not just financial compensation, but acknowledgement of the crimes committed and the lasting damage caused by slavery? Or would this just worsen social tensions by reopening old wounds? That's the theme of this week's Sunday Debate. Arguing for the motion were Kehinde Andrews, Professor of Black Studies at Birmingham City University; and Esther Stanford-Xosei, reparations activist and lawyer. Arguing against the motion were Katharine Birbalsingh, headmistress and co-founder of Michaela Community School in London; and Tony Sewell, educational consultant and CEO of the charity Generating Genius. The debate was chaired by social historian and presenter Emma Dabiri.

Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/intelligencesquared.

See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices