A, well, ok, that's a pretty uncharitable appraisel s jefferson. I mean, to unite the country and actually have a country, he had to make compromises with the southern states and ounow they wanted slavery. And wouldn't that be a more loving thing to do, is, you know, not rape your slave, but fall in love with the black woman and have children with her because you love her? That seems to be a more charitable way to look at it. Anyway, iow this, this defenistration of everybody that doesn't meet our moral standards that were established. You dot last t Tuesday. He know, historicallyit seems pretty problematic
August 15 marks the 50th anniversary of day one of the Stanford Prison Experiment — one of the most controversial studies in the history of social psychology. In this conversation, Michael Shermer speaks with renowned social psychologist and creator of the Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo, exploring the mechanisms that make good people do bad things, how moral people can be seduced into acting immorally, and what this says about the line separating good from evil. His book, The Lucifer Effect, explains why we are all susceptible to the lure of “the dark side.” and how situational forces and group dynamics can work in concert to make monsters out of decent men and women. Shermer and Zimbardo discuss: Zimbardo’s life mission to understand the nature of evil, the Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) and its critics, the nature of human nature, The Dark Triad that leads to violence, obedience to authority, free will/determinism, and how we can teach ourselves to act heroically.