M, it isn't the case that atheists have no moral values. In fact, if you look at research on criminality and nbehavior, atheists are not more criminal than those of faith. There's evidence therlesq likely to be engaged in mor what we would call immoral and criminal behavior. And so human flourishing is our moral foundation. We start there, human flourishing. Now, what can we do to structure society in such a way that, you know, humans flourish? That's pretty obvious. You know, democracys better than autocracy,. having rights versus no rights, and and expansion of the moral sphere to include more people. These are just kind of basic arguments that i
Michael Shermer speaks with Gale Sinatra and Barbara Hofer about the key psychological explanations for science denial and doubt that can help provide a means for improving scientific literacy and understanding — critically important at a time when denial has become deadly. Sinatra and Hofer offer tools for addressing science denial and explain both the importance of science education and its limitations, show how science communicators may inadvertently contribute to the problem, and explain how the internet and social media foster misinformation and disinformation. The authors focus on key psychological constructs such as reasoning biases, social identity, epistemic cognition, and emotions and attitudes that limit or facilitate public understanding of science, and describe solutions for individuals, educators, science communicators, and policy makers. If you have ever wondered why science denial exists, want to know how to understand your own biases and those of others, and would like to address the problem, this book will provide the insights you are seeking.