Judicial Handling of Trump's Legal Issues

This chapter compares three judges presiding over trials related to Donald Trump, focusing on their management of Trump's disruptive behavior and insults. It delves into the challenges of maintaining order in the courtroom and the dynamics of reaching legal conclusions amidst public opinion. The disparities between high-profile criminal trials like Trump's and the everyday realities of the criminal justice system are highlighted, shedding light on the complexities of the legal process and its potential for manipulation.