Emotional Bonds and Legal Battles in Animal Welfare

11min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

This chapter explores the deep emotional connections formed through caregiving, particularly in nurturing relationships with children and pets. It juxtaposes these bonds with the legal challenges faced in improving the welfare of animals, especially chickens in factory farms, highlighting the inadequacies of animal cruelty laws and the potential of civil litigation. The discussion also examines the strategic evaluation of legal cases aimed at enhancing animal welfare, advocating for innovative approaches to hold abusers accountable.

Read the full transcript here.

Are all animals equally intelligent but in different ways? Do some animals perceive the passage of time differently from humans? Are our definitions of intelligence biased towards our own human strengths and therefore not fairly applicable to other animals? Is a baby human's pre-linguistic communication (like crying) analogous to the ways other animals communicate? Is civil litigation the best strategy for defending animal rights? Human lawyers represent their clients, but can other animals be clients? Can other animals be plaintiffs or defendants in human courts?

Alene Anello is the founder of Legal Impact for Chickens, a litigation nonprofit that seeks to make animal cruelty a liability. Before founding Legal Impact for Chickens, Alene graduated from Harvard Law School, clerked for a federal judge, and then started litigating for animals. She has worked at People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), the Animal Legal Defense Fund, and The Good Food Institute. Her undergraduate degree is also from Harvard. Alene is committed to helping chickens to honor the memories of her two beloved avian family members, Conrad and Zeke. Find out more about her and her work at legalimpactforchickens.org.

Staff