He says two sources of variation, which are not sufficient, indeed, to confound the boundaries of beauty. So we will otof imbounding, but will often serve to produce a different indifference in the degrees of our approbation or blame. And so, like, he's saying, like, this is just going to happen, and there's nothing we can do about it. That's how i read that, yes. But s contrasting this with what might cause variability in our judgments that might have to do with bias. If you like a work of art because your friend made ity, then that differences is, i think he's making an norm of claim. That
Many of us think that art is subjective, but at the same time it seems like some artistic judgments are better than others. Do you think Crash deserved to receive an award for Best Picture? Did you like Season 2 of Ted Lasso? Well you’re wrong. So how do we reconcile these two conflicting attitudes about art? David and Tamler turn to David Hume’s classic essay Of the Standard of Taste (link in notes) for help. Will Pizarro finally see the error of his ways on Straw Dogs?
Plus a doozy of a medical ethics paper – should we allow people to change their legal age if it doesn’t match their "biological" and "emotional" age?
Sponsored By:
Support Very Bad Wizards
Links: