Judicial Interpretations and Legal Philosophies

The chapter explores the impact of Supreme Court decisions on fundamental rights, comparing cases like Brown v. Board of Education and Roe v. Wade. It scrutinizes the distinctions between good and bad originalism in interpreting the Constitution, discussing the necessity of amendments like the 19th amendment for ensuring equal rights. The conversation delves into the conflict between originalism and common lawism in legal interpretation, highlighting the challenges of applying fixed rules to evolving societal norms.