The Difference Between Abduct of Argument and Deductive Argument

i want to think about it deductively. I want to say, here's the different four options that you can use to explain who jesus was. And then what you do then is then run through the and say, he wasn't a lunatic,. He wasn't a liar, it's not a legend, so therefore it's lord. That, to me, is more of a deductive way of arguing. But maybe you don't really see any conflict there. So why don't we just turn now, instead of talking about structure and how it's all set up and everything, let's talk about the different options  and then work through some of the objections...