Chatham House's Digital Society Debate Is Misleading, Dangerous and Disappointing

6min Snip

00:00

Play full episode

Summary

Transcript

Episode notes

Technology is not a separate, distinct bucket of chatham house. The tect sector permeates the entirety of the house. We understand the real world better because we encounter it. And i'm actually proud of us that we are stepping up our game and our responsibility to have these conversations head on. A million dreams for the wor d we're going to make. Thank you Ti.

With so much data and power centralised in the hands of a few West Coast companies, the tech giants have become a serious threat to our basic freedoms and must be broken up. That’s the argument that was made at this major Intelligence Squared debate by the FT’s global business columnist Rana Foroohar and by businessman and former chairman of Channel 4 Luke Johnson. But others would argue that it’s all too easy to make the tech giants a scapegoat for the inevitable upheavals caused by the digital revolution. The real winners of this revolution are not the tech companies but us, the users. Who could now imagine living without the services of Amazon, Apple, Google, Facebook and Microsoft? That’s the case that was made in our debate by former head of Facebook’s European politics and government division Elizabeth Linder and competition law expert Pinar Akman. Who's right and who's wrong?

Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/intelligencesquared.

See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices