The New York Times, a Goldman Analyst, and a Greg Smith Ik Leaked This.
A goldman analyst who technically did go otal for, it was a low level goldman analyst. I don't fear, because, veybo ta, that wasn't because of that financial crisis. It's on ter twittering ons that they crept more and substative content for free. Do zero abs. After this, i was, ironically. The only guy here who was employed by goldman around that time when all this happened, they went into jail as for this almost unrelated reason. Yes. So, s this gives to another thought that i was having while i'm lit listening to this, the reading, you can read hisoped on the new york times,.
Transcript
chevron_right
Play full episode
chevron_right
Transcript
Episode notes
As a $60 billion a year investment bank engaged in market making and asset management for equities, fixed income, commodity and derivative securities for large institutional clients, Goldman Sachs, having been founded in 1869, is arguably the world’s most recognizable name on Wall Street. Known for attracting some of the best financial talent, it is both respected and feared, in some cases being accused of “ripping their clients off” in the relentless pursuit of profits. Defenders of firms like Goldman Sachs make a big deal about how they’re instrumental in the efficient allocation of (financial) capital, but one could argue the concentration of highly intelligent and motivated individuals operating what amounts to a glorified casino is a gross misallocation of human capital, robbing other critical sectors of talent that would otherwise have gone to engineering real solutions, not financial ones.
