Religious Liberty

i tend to make a twofold argument. One is a principale argument, one is a more pragmatic argument. The principal argument roots religious liberty among the sort of damental human needs. But then there's this pragmatic aspect as well: What happens to human beings when you deny that right? And the history is really clear. I'm reading thi this a, i'm listening sorry to the podcast called revolutions, jonah has recommended. It starts with the english civil war and how much spiritual power in the hands of the king was d stabilizing if you had a theological dispute. Ah, it doesn't need to be religion. Like the fact that religion loomed so large in