Is Religion a Truth Procedure?

i think the book on paul ok gives a really good sense of what the event means for him, in the relationship between situation and event. I haven't read that, so i'm going to see it, so maybe would agree with you. He says religion cannot be a truth procedure ecause it's not true, right? He revas something that's, that's imaginary. Soh, i think that's fascinating. Mean, his take on religion as a whole, i think its pretty, is pretty interesting, just because it's so negative. It's almost asas froud's, oh, nes really, really nohe sees religion as the opposite of philosophy.