The Reliability of My Cognitive Faculties

Bergman wants to say, look, i have non propositional evidence that my cognitive faculties are able. And this is a phrase of his, in the basic way. It's e it's in a way, he titles his article common sense naturalism. So ther common sense faculty, a sort of readin, you mention thomas read earlier in the overture. A bergman thinks that that's a very plausible, plausible route. But notice, it challenges the second premise of planega's argument, right? I do not inherit a defeater to the reliability of my cognitive faculties.